Health agencies face an array of profound challenges. Among them, the need to exert control over surging pharmaceutical expenditures is imperative (Dubois et al. 2000). If pharmaceutical expenditure is left… Click to show full abstract
Health agencies face an array of profound challenges. Among them, the need to exert control over surging pharmaceutical expenditures is imperative (Dubois et al. 2000). If pharmaceutical expenditure is left unchecked, it threatens to jeopardise health systems’ fiscal sustainability and violate equity and solidarity, which are fundamental principles in health care provision. Pharmaceutical care has significantly contributed towards life’s expectancy increase and morbidity reduction, so health agencies must balance the need to keep affordable prices and give patients access to innovative products (Lichtenberg 2012). Usually, the price of a pharmaceutical is nested in its intellectual property rather than in its value or its ingredients. The asymmetry of information between involving parties deprives patients from the ability to make informed decision-making and blurs the transmission of pharmaceutical’s price as a signal. This leaves countries embroiled in significant troubles while trying to satisfy the discordant needs of patients, physicians but also abide by the national fiscal policies as well. High prices constitute a major cause of delay in the reimbursement process. This delay impedes timely access, a fundamental function of a health system, which comprises a decisive factor in many debilitating and degenerative diseases. Apart from the potential negative impact on health, this lingering may expose patients to potentially catastrophic out-of-pocket expenditures, if they opt to buy an indicated medicine out-of-pocket. Of particular interest is the fact that the prices of pharmaceutical products do not correlate to their value. Value is a highly unmeasured and misinterpreted term. Yet, even within the limitations of its conceptual vagueness, value, as attested by hard clinical endpoints, should constitute the core of any health system. And value is rather rare in the pharmaceutical sector (Kantarjian et al. 2013). To this direction, the goal of our study was to develop a pricing scheme which provides that the price of a pharmaceutical is set pertinent to its value and related direct and indirect costs, in the form of a value-based pricing (VBP) scheme. Specifically, we set pharmaceutical prices based on their incremental (compared to the current therapeutic benchmark) medical, social and financial benefits and costs, in the context of a defined willingnessto-pay (WTP) threshold. The defined value-based (VB) price comprises not only a signal, but it also embeds the acceptable health utility that it will be foregone in the broader health system. We also explored the conceptual and operational framework of the VBP. This includes practical ways to implement the VBP, assessment of its limitations and ways to extenuate their impact. Our study focused on oncology, which accounts for up to 30% of total health expenditures. The increase rate of oncology products is greater than of all other corresponding sectors, increasing 100% between 2005 and 2014. We further focused on metastatic renal cell carcinoma, a rare cancer, with limited therapeutic options. We developed a Markov Model which simulates disease progression and included all relevant costs and health gains. The output of the model was the definition of the VB price of sorafenib to best supportive care (BSC). This VB price rendered the product cost-effective based on WTP thresholds suggested by the WHO (Dias et al. 2013; Petrou and Talias 2014). In addition, this VB price captured all medical and societal gains, including survival, disease progression, quality of life, side effects and all direct and indirect costs. We concluded that the VB price of sorafenib should have been 28% lower than its current retail price. In Cyprus, pharmaceutical prices are set at the European average. Since our model was mainly sensitive to efficacy data mined from international studies, and depended much less on local data, our results could serve as a proxy for other countries (Petrou and Talias 2013). VBP comprises a paradigm shift that distributes risk among payer and industry and is evocative of delivering This Editorial is part of the series ‘‘Young Researcher Editorial’’, a training project of the Swiss School of Public Health.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.