LAUSR

Purpose Pubic symphysis diastasis with an incidence of approximately 20% in pelvic fractures is a severe lesion which needs to be treated properly. The objective of this retrospective study was to describe and evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes including its advantages and limitations of this modified minimal invasive technique. Methods Totally 29 patients with pubic symphysis diastasis, with or without posterior ring instability, were treated by modified pedicle screw–rod fixation (modified PSRF) between January 2010 and December 2016. The duration from injury to surgery, operation time, intraoperative blood loss as well as complications were recorded. During follow-up, the functional outcomes were assessed according to the Majeed evaluation criteria 1 year postoperatively. The evaluation of the postoperative reduction quality was carried out according to Matta criteria. Results According to Tile classification, there were 9 cases of Type B1 underwent only anterior-modified PSRF and 20 cases of Type C1 experienced anterior-modified PSRF combined with posterior fixation. The duration from injury to operation, operation time and intraoperative blood loss were 3.27 days (range 1–6 days), 42.07 min (range 38–45 min), and 46.14 ml (range 40–55 ml). The results of reduction quality were rated as excellent in 16, good in 11 and fair in 2 based on Matta criteria. The Majeed functional scores ranged from 68 to 95 and there were excellent in 15, good in 12 and fair in 2. No patients experienced incision infection. Slight loosening of middle-two screws was verified during follow-up in one patient. Two patients underwent femoral nerve palsy. Irritation to the LFCN was detected in four patients. Conclusions Modified PSRF can be performed as an alternative to manage pubic symphysis diastasis due to its merits of minimal invasive, less blood loss, less soft tissue injuries as well as shorter operation time, even with the early weight-bearing. Trial registration Researchregistry3905.