LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

What endpoints should be used for clinical studies in acute kidney injury?

Photo from wikipedia

Introduction Probably the easiest way to ruin a clinical trial is to choose the wrong endpoint. Our assessment as to whether something works in medicine, whether treatment or diagnostic, is… Click to show full abstract

Introduction Probably the easiest way to ruin a clinical trial is to choose the wrong endpoint. Our assessment as to whether something works in medicine, whether treatment or diagnostic, is based on “hitting” the primary endpoint. In the rough and tumble world of clinical trials, there are few second chances, especially for new drugs or devices. Thus, it is often an “all or nothing” mentality that drives the field, and even missing the endpoint in a phase-2 trial can sap the interest and investment needed to conduct a phase-3. For trials in acute kidney injury (AKI), the first question is whether the purpose of the intervention is to prevent or treat. For prevention trials (or for diagnostics), it is unrealistic to use anything other than AKI itself as the primary endpoint. This is because powering a prevention trial for downstream outcomes is extremely difficult.

Keywords: medicine; kidney injury; endpoint; endpoints used; acute kidney

Journal Title: Intensive Care Medicine
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.