PurposeThe effects of the route of nutrition on the gut mucosa of patients with shock are unclear. Plasma citrulline concentration is a marker of enterocyte mass, and plasma intestinal fatty… Click to show full abstract
PurposeThe effects of the route of nutrition on the gut mucosa of patients with shock are unclear. Plasma citrulline concentration is a marker of enterocyte mass, and plasma intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) concentration is a marker of enterocyte damage. We aimed to study the effect of the route of nutrition on plasma citrulline concentration measured at day 3 of nutrition.Materials and methodsAncillary study of the NUTRIREA-2 trial. Ventilated adults with shock were randomly assigned to receive enteral or parenteral nutrition. Enterocyte biomarkers were measured at baseline, day 3, and day 8 of nutrition.ResultA total of 165 patients from 13 French ICUs were included in the study: 85 patients in the enteral group and 80 patients in the parenteral group. At baseline, plasma citrulline was low without difference between groups (12.2 µmol L−1 vs 13.3 µmol L−1). At day 3, plasma citrulline concentration was higher in the enteral group than in the parenteral group (18.7 µmol L−1 vs 15.3 µmol L−1, p = 0.01). Plasma I-FABP concentration was increased at baseline, without difference between groups (245 pg mL−1 vs 244 pg mL−1). Plasma I-FABP concentration was higher in the enteral group than in the parenteral group at day 3 and day 8 (158 pg mL−1 vs 50 pg mL−1, p = 0.005 and 225 pg mL−1 vs 50 pg mL−1, p = 0.03).ConclusionPlasma citrulline concentration was higher after 3 days of enteral nutrition than after 3 days of parenteral nutrition. This result raises the question of the possibility that enteral nutrition is associated with a more rapid restoration of enterocyte mass than parenteral nutrition.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.