LAUSR

PurposeIn this prospective, double-center cohort study, we aim to assess how the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) potentially varies between a group of patients with anatomic ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring grafts 6 months postoperatively and a healthy ACL control group, and how MRI-based graft signal intensity is related to knee laxity.MethodsSixty-two consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft were prospectively invited to participate in this study, and they were evaluated with MRI after 6 months of follow-up. 50 patients with an MRI of their healthy ACL (Clinica Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland) and 12 patients of their contralateral healthy knee (Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria) served as the control group. To evaluate graft maturity, the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) was measured in three regions of interest (ROIs) of the proximal, mid-substance and distal ACL graft and the healthy ACL. KT-1000 findings were obtained 6 months postoperatively in the ACL reconstruction group. Statistical analysis was independently performed to outline the differences in the two groups regarding ACL intensity and the correlation between SNQ and KT-1000 values.ResultsThere was a significant difference in the mean SNQ between the reconstructed ACL grafts and the healthy ACLs in the proximal and mid-substance regions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004). The distal region of the reconstructed ACL showed a mean SNQ similar to the native ACL (n.s). Patients with a KT-1000 between 0 and 1 mm showed a mean SNQ of 0.1; however, a poor correlation was found between the mean SNQ and KT-1000 findings, probably due to the small sample size of patients with higher laxity.ConclusionAfter 6 months of follow-up, hamstring tendon autografts for anatomic ACL reconstruction do not show equal MRI signal intensity compared to a healthy ACL and should therefore be considered immature or at least not completely healed even if clinical laxity measurement provides good results. However, in the case of a competitive athlete, who is clinically stable and wants to return to sports at 6 months, performing an MRI to confirm the stage of graft healing might be an option.Level of evidenceProspective, comparative study II.