LAUSR

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in the center point of the femoral ACL footprint according to the morphological variations of the Blumensaat’s line. Methods Fifty-nine non-paired human cadaver knees were used. The ACL was cut in the middle, and the femoral bone was cut at the most proximal point of the femoral notch. Digital images were evaluated using the Image J software. The periphery of the femoral ACL footprint was outlined and the center point was measured automatically. Following Iriuchishima’s classification, the morphology of the Blumensaat’s line was classified into straight and hill types (small and large hill types). The center of the femoral ACL footprint and hilltop placement were evaluated using the quadrant method. A quadrant grid was placed uniformly, irregardless of hill existence, and not including the articular cartilage. A correlation analysis was performed between the center point of the femoral ACL footprint and hilltop placement. Results The straight type consisted of 19 knees, and the hill type 40 knees (small hill type 13 knees and large hill type 27 knees). The center of the femoral ACL footprint (shallow-deep/high-low) in the straight and hill type knees was 33.7/47.6%, and 37.2/50.3%, respectively. In the hill type, the ACL footprint center was significantly more shallow when compared to the straight type. Significant correlation was observed between the center point of the femoral ACL footprint and hilltop placement of the Blumensaat’s line. Conclusion The center point of the femoral ACL footprint was significantly more shallow in the hill type knees when compared to the straight type. For clinical relevance, considering that the location of the femoral ACL footprint center is different depending on the Blumensaat’s line morphology, to perform accurate ACL reconstruction, femoral ACL tunnel placement should be made based on Blumensaat’s line morphological variations.