LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study

Photo by apsprudente from unsplash

Introduction and hypothesisVaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, specific factors that influence the risk of OASIS at VBAC… Click to show full abstract

Introduction and hypothesisVaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, specific factors that influence the risk of OASIS at VBAC have not been studied, particularly whether there are specific baseline characteristics of the first delivery which affect the subsequent perineal outcomes.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from University of Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts’ maternity database. This included secundiparous women with a previous caesarean delivery (CS) who achieved a singleton, term, cephalic vaginal delivery from 2004 to 2014. Univariate analysis compared maternal, intrapartum and neonatal factors of those who suffered OASIS at VBAC with those who did not. A binary logistic regression model calculated the adjusted, independent odds ratio (OR) of OASIS.ResultsA total of 1375 women met the inclusion criteria. The OASIS rate was 8.1%, a 1.4-fold increase compared with primiparous women [difference 2.4% (95% CI 1.1, 3.6)]. Those sustaining OASIS at VBAC were older (p = 0.011) and had infants of greater birth weight at initial caesarean (p < 0.001) and VBAC (p = 0.04). Analysis of odds ratios revealed that mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) at VBAC halved the risk of OASIS [37.5% VBAC with OASIS vs. 52.2% VBAC without OASIS (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.81)], whereas an urgent CS at initial delivery doubled the risk [52.3% VBAC with OASIS vs. 34.9% VBAC without OASIS (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31–3.21)].ConclusionsAdvanced maternal age, increased infant birth weight and an urgent category of initial CS increase the risk of OASIS at VBAC, whereas MLE is protective.

Keywords: birth caesarean; risk; vbac; oasis; oasis vbac; obstetric anal

Journal Title: International Urogynecology Journal
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.