LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Competitive pricing despite search costs when lower price signals quality

Photo by thirdcoastdad from unsplash

The Diamond paradox demonstrates that when learning prices is costly for consumers, each firm has market power. However, making firms privately informed about their quality and cost restores competitive pricing… Click to show full abstract

The Diamond paradox demonstrates that when learning prices is costly for consumers, each firm has market power. However, making firms privately informed about their quality and cost restores competitive pricing if quality and cost are negatively correlated. Such correlation arises from, e.g. regulation, differing equipment or skill, or economies of scale. If good quality firms have lower costs, then they can signal quality by cutting prices, in which case bad quality firms must cut prices to retain customers. This price-cutting race to the bottom ends in an equilibrium in which all firms price nearly competitively and cheap talk reveals quality.

Keywords: quality; despite search; price; competitive pricing; pricing despite

Journal Title: Economic Theory
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.