LAUSR

This study examined if people with chronic stroke (PwCS) could adapt following non-paretic overground gait-slips and whether such prior exposure to non-paretic slips could improve reactive responses on novel paretic slip. Forty-nine PwCS were randomly assigned to either adaptation group, which received eight unexpected, overground, nonparetic-side gait-slips followed by two paretic-side slips or a control group, which received two paretic-side slips. Slip outcome, recovery strategies, center of mass (CoM) state stability, post-slip stride length and slipping kinematics were analyzed. The adaptation group demonstrated fall-reduction from first to eighth non-paretic slips, along with improved stability, stride length and slipping kinematics (p < 0.05). Within the adaptation group, on comparing novel slips, paretic-side demonstrated comparable pre-slip stability (p > 0.05); however, lower post-slip stability, increased slip velocity and falls was noted (p < 0.05). There was no difference in any variables between the novel paretic slips of adaptation and control group (p > 0.01). However, there was a rapid improvement on the 2nd slip such that adaptation group demonstrated improved performance from the first to second paretic slip compared to that in the control group (p < 0.01). PwCS demonstrated immediate proactive and reactive adaptation with overground, nonparetic-side gait-slips. However, PwCS did not demonstrate any inter-limb performance gain on the paretic-side after prior nonparetic-side adaptation when exposed to a novel paretic-side slip; but they did show significant positive gains with single slip priming on the paretic-side compared to controls without prior adaptation.Clinical registry number: NCT03205527.