BackgroundGastrointestinal (GI) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) commonly limit immune checkpoint inhibitors’ (ICIs) treatment, which is very effective for metastatic melanoma. The independent impact of GI-irAEs on patients’ survival is not… Click to show full abstract
BackgroundGastrointestinal (GI) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) commonly limit immune checkpoint inhibitors’ (ICIs) treatment, which is very effective for metastatic melanoma. The independent impact of GI-irAEs on patients’ survival is not well studied. We aimed to assess the impact of GI-irAEs on survival rates of patients with metastatic melanoma using multivariate model.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients with metastatic melanoma who developed GI-irAEs from 1/2010 through 4/2018. A number of randomized patients who did not have GI-irAEs were included as controls. Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test were used to estimate unadjusted survival durations. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate survival predictors; irAEs were included as time-dependent variables.ResultsA total of 346 patients were included, 173 patients had GI-irAEs; 124 (72%) received immunosuppression. In multivariate Cox regression, ECOG 2–3 (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.44–4.57; P < 0.01), LDH ≥ 618 IU/L (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.47–3.29; P < 0.01), stage M1c (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.35–3.60; P < 0.01) were associated with worse OS rates. Any grade GI-irAEs (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36–0.78; P < 0.01) was associated with improved OS rates. Immunosuppressive treatment did not affect OS (P = 0.15). High-grade diarrhea was associated with improved OS (P = 0.04). Patients who developed GI-irAEs had longer PFS durations on Cox model (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41–0.76; P < 0.01).ConclusionGI-irAEs are associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with metastatic melanoma. Furthermore, higher grades of diarrhea are associated with even better patients’ OS rates.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.