LAUSR

Background Two main minimal access adrenalectomy techniques are available: laparoscopic transperitoneal (LTA) and posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). This study aims to compare these approaches in an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled (RCT) and non-randomised comparative (NRT) trials. Methods A systematic search of comparative LTA and PRA studies was performed. Standard demographic and surgical data were recorded. Outcome measures compared included: operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion to open, post-operative pain, time to oral intake and ambulation, early morbidity, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and mortality. Quality of RCTs and NRTs was assessed using Cochrane and ROBINS-I, respectively, and heterogeneity using the I 2 test. Dichotomous and continuous variables were compared using odds ratios and mean/standard difference. Studies were then combined using the Mantel–Haenszel method. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed- and random-effect models. Results Following exclusions, 12 studies were included in the analysis: 3 RCTs and 9 NRTs. These reported a total of 775 patients: 341 (44%) PRA and 434 (56%) LTA. Demographics were similar except for tumour size which was smaller (by 0.78 cm) in PRA ( p  = 0.003). Significant differences in outcome were seen in EBL (18 mls less in PRA, p  = 0.006), time to oral intake (3.4 h sooner in PRA p  = 0.009) and HLOS (shorter in PRA by 0.84 day, p  = 0.001). Conclusions This analysis demonstrates that while PRA tends to be performed for smaller tumours it allows for less EBL, earlier post-operative oral intake and shorter hospital stays. In appropriately selected patients, it represents an invaluable tool in the endocrine surgeon’s armamentarium.