To assess the accuracy and applicability of an electromagnetic navigation system (EMNS) for CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of hepatic tumors in comparison with conventional CT-guidance. 34 patients (m = 20/f = 14, mean age… Click to show full abstract
To assess the accuracy and applicability of an electromagnetic navigation system (EMNS) for CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of hepatic tumors in comparison with conventional CT-guidance. 34 patients (m = 20/f = 14, mean age 34 y) with 34 liver tumors (primary = 22, metastases = 14, mean size 20 mm) referred for CT-guided MWA were included in this IRB-approved study. Interventions were performed prospectively using an EMNS in 17 patients (navigation group), and results were compared to a matched historic cohort of 17 patients using conventional CT-guidance (control group, t-test, p < 0.05 deemed significant). Primary outcome measurement: accuracy of antenna placement (deviation). Secondary outcome measurements: setup time, number of control scans, duration and radiation exposure for antenna placement. Ablations were performed using a single or a double-angulated approach. Application of the EMNS was feasible in 14 cases (82%). Mean total deviation of the antenna feed point in the navigation and control group was 2.4 mm (range 0.2–4.8 mm) and 3.9 mm (range 0.4–7.8 mm), p < 0.05. Mean setup time for the EMNS was 6.75 ± 3.9 min (range 3–12 min). Mean number of control scans in the navigation and control group was 3 ± 0.9 (range 1–4) and 6 ± 1.3 (range 4–8), p < 0.0001; mean time for antenna placement was 9 ± 7.3 min (range 1.4–25.9 min) and 11.45 ± 6.1 min (range 3.9–27.4 min), p = 0.3164. Radiation exposure was significantly less in the navigation group. Our experience in a limited number of patients suggests that EMNS enables intuitive CT-guided MWA of liver tumors with higher accuracy when compared to ablations performed without navigation and with fewer control scans needed.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.