LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of full-iodine conventional CT and half-iodine virtual monochromatic imaging: advantages and disadvantages

Photo from wikipedia

PurposeTo compare image quality of abdominal arteries between full-iodine-dose conventional CT and half-iodine-dose virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI).Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated images of 21 patients (10 men, 11 women; mean… Click to show full abstract

PurposeTo compare image quality of abdominal arteries between full-iodine-dose conventional CT and half-iodine-dose virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI).Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated images of 21 patients (10 men, 11 women; mean age, 73.9 years) who underwent both full-iodine (600 mg/kg) conventional CT and half-iodine (300 mg/kg) VMI. For each patient, we measured and compared CT attenuation and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the aorta, celiac artery, and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). We also compared CT dose index (CTDI). Two board-certified diagnostic radiologists evaluated visualisation of the main trunks and branches of the celiac artery and SMA in maximum-intensity-projection images. We evaluated spatial resolution of the two scans using an acrylic phantom.ResultsThe two scans demonstrated no significant difference in CT attenuation of the aorta, celiac artery, and SMA, but CNRs of the aorta and celiac artery were significantly higher in VMI (p = 0.011 and 0.030, respectively). CTDI was significantly higher in VMI (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference in visualisation of the main trunk of the celiac artery and SMA, but visualisation of the gastroduodenal artery, pancreatic arcade, branch of the SMA, marginal arteries, and vasa recta was significantly better in the conventional scan (p < 0.001). The calculated modular transfer function (MTF) suggested decreased spatial resolution of the half-iodine VMI.ConclusionLarge-vessel depiction and CNRs were comparable between full-iodine conventional CT and half-iodine VMI images, but VMI did not permit clear visualisation of small arteries and required a larger radiation dose.Key Points・Reducing the dose of iodine contrast medium is essential for chronic kidney disease patients to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy.・In virtual monochromatic images at low keV, contrast of relatively large vessels is maintained even with reduced iodine load, but visibility of small vessels is impaired with decreased spatial resolution.・We should be aware about the advantages and disadvantages associated with virtual monochromatic imaging with reduced iodine dose.

Keywords: artery; conventional half; virtual monochromatic; half; full iodine; half iodine

Journal Title: European Radiology
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.