LAUSR

To investigate the role of clinicopathological factors and MR imaging factors in risk stratification of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients who were classified as LR-M and LR-4/5. We retrospectively identified consecutive patients who were confirmed as cHCC-CCA after surgical surgery in our institution from June 2015 to November 2020. Two radiologists evaluated the preoperative MR imaging features independently, and each lesion was assigned with a LI-RADS category. Preoperative clinical data were also collected. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was applied to separately identify the independent factors correlated with the recurrence of cHCC-CCAs in LR-M and LR-4/5. Risk stratifications were conducted separately in LR-M and LR-4/5. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test. A total of 131 patients with single primary lesion which met the 2019 WHO classification criteria were finally included. Corona enhancement, delayed central enhancement, and microvascular invasion (MVI) were identified as predictors of RFS in LR-M. Mosaic architecture, CA19-9, and MVI were independently associated with RFS in LR-4/5. Based on the number of these independent predictors, patients were stratified into favorable-outcome groups (LR-ML subgroup and LR-4/5L subgroup) and dismal-outcome groups (LR-MH subgroup and LR-4/5H subgroup). The corresponding median RFS for LR-ML, LR-MH, LR-5L, and LR-5H were 25.6 months, 8.2 months, 51.7 months, and 18.1 months. Our study explored the prognostic values of imaging and clinicopathological factors for LR-M and LR-4/5 cHCC-CCA patients, and different survival outcomes were observed among four subgroups after conducting risk stratifications. • Corona enhancement, delayed central enhancement, and MVI were identified as predictors of RFS in cHCC-CCAs which were classified into LR-M. Mosaic architecture, CA19-9, and MVI were independently associated with RFS in cHCC-CCAs which were classified into LR-4/5. • Based on the identified risk factors, LR-M and LR-4/5 cHCC-CCA patients could be stratified into two subgroups respectively, with significantly different RFS and OS. • cHCC-CCA patients from LR-M did not always have worse RFS and OS than those from LR-4/5 in some cases.