LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Clinical impact of improvement in the ankle–brachial index after endovascular therapy for peripheral arterial disease

Photo from wikipedia

Predictive ability of changes in the ankle–brachial index (ABI) after revascularization for long-term clinical outcomes remains unclear. Pre- and postprocedural ABI were recorded for 1307 consecutive patients who underwent their… Click to show full abstract

Predictive ability of changes in the ankle–brachial index (ABI) after revascularization for long-term clinical outcomes remains unclear. Pre- and postprocedural ABI were recorded for 1307 consecutive patients who underwent their first successful EVT for symptomatic aortoiliac ( n  = 710) or femoropopliteal ( n  = 597) lesions. The patients were divided into two groups according to the increase in ABI: ∆ABI ≥ 0.15 ( n  = 980) and ∆ABI < 0.15 ( n  = 327). We investigated the association between ABI improvement after EVT and long-term clinical outcomes. The clinical outcome measures included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, target limb revascularization, EVT for target lesion revascularization, major amputation of the target limb, and a composite endpoint that included both target limb revascularization and major amputation. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ∆ABI ≥ 0.15 group than in the ∆ABI < 0.15 group [crude hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60–0.98, P  = 0.03]; however, this was no longer statistically significant after adjusting for baseline characteristics (adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63–1.07, P  = 0.14). A composite of target limb revascularization and major amputation was less often observed at 10 years in the ΔABI ≥ 0.15 group (258 patients, 38%) compared with the ΔABI < 0.15 group (112 patients, 59%; adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42–0.68, P  < 0.001), mainly because of a lower risk of target limb revascularization (adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42–0.69, P  < 0.001). No significant interactions were noted with regard to the locations of the treated lesions ( P for the interaction, 0.13) or preprocedural ABI ( P for the interaction, 0.40). An increase of ABI ≥ 0.15 after successful EVT was an independent predictor for freedom from a composite of target limb revascularization and major amputation, irrespective of the locations of the treated lesions and the preprocedural ABI.

Keywords: abi; limb revascularization; revascularization; target limb

Journal Title: Heart and Vessels
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.