LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Special Annual Issue on CNS Infections

Photo from wikipedia

Dear Editor: The brain and the spinal cord are truly well protected from infections by the skull and the bony spine and are surrounded by layers of meninges which form… Click to show full abstract

Dear Editor: The brain and the spinal cord are truly well protected from infections by the skull and the bony spine and are surrounded by layers of meninges which form a strongmechanical barrier. This defense is reinforced by the chemical filtering capacity of the blood-brain barrier. In spite of this, infections do occur in the central nervous system (CNS). When they do occur, it can lead to poor outcomes and exorbitant healthcare costs. Yet infections of the CNS have been known from ancient times as the article by Kobets and Goodrich describes. Although the epidemiologic transition from infectious to degenerative disease has been completed in developed countries, the former remains an important source of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in less-developed countries and immunocompromised patients in the developed world. Recent resurgence of infections even in the developed world has been also attributed to immigration trends and improper use of antimicrobial drugs. Children form a more susceptible group as far as infections of the CNS are concerned, and these do not only cause temporary debility, but often leave behind a stigmata of permanent damage to the brain and spinal cord. This not only damages the individual child but also devastates the family and has serious implications in terms of the social cost of healthcare. It is with the aim of increasing awareness of this seldom discussed problem that this special annual issue is dedicated to the world’s children afflicted at some time with various infectious diseases. Infections of the skull and bony spine represent a dichotomy between the developed and developing world. In the former, postsurgical infections are common, and in the latter, scalp and paranasal sinus infections represent the common sources [1]. Cranial epidural abscesses are the third most common localized intracranial suppuration after brain abscesses and subdural empyema. Medical therapy together with surgical drainage is required in the majority of cases together with eradication of the source of infection [2]. Subdural empyemas, like epidural abscesses occur mainly in the pediatric population and often after bacterial meningitis. Surgical management is mandated in most cases as elaborated in the article by Muzumdar et al., the only controversy being in the use of corticosteroids [3, 4]. Brain abscesses, which are in fact intracerebral suppurative collections, represent the most dangerous infection of the CNS, as described in the article by WT Seow and colleagues. Whereas contiguous spread is common in developing countries, the heart and lung represent sources of hematogenous spread and are more common in the developed world. In about 25% cases, no source can be found. Aspiration versus excision remains the unanswered debate, with the treatment depending on the stage of the abscess formation [5]. Pyogenic ventriculitis is another life-threatening form of infection occurring mainly in children. Intravenous antibiotics have often got to be supplemented by intrathecal antibiotics and more recently with ventricular lavage [6, 7], a treatment not only directed at the infection, but also at the ensuing hydrocephalus. The article by UV Thomale’s group describes in details the procedure of ventricular lavage in this situation. It would appear that intraventricular administration of antibiotics would produce higher antibiotic concentrations in the fluid in the brain than intravenous administration alone and eliminate the bacteria more quickly. However, only one trial [8] exists, and this trial enrolling infants with gram-negative meningitis and ventriculitis, the use of intraventricular antibiotics in addition to intravenous antibiotics showed threefold increased risk for mortality compared to standard treatment with intravenous antibiotics alone. Based on this result, it would appear that intraventricular antibiotics should be * Chandrashekhar Deopujari [email protected]

Keywords: article; annual issue; cns; special annual; world; brain

Journal Title: Child's Nervous System
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.