PurposePatient specific selection of cochlear implants would benefit from pre-operative knowledge of cochlear length. Several methods for its measurement or estimation have been described in literature. This study focused on… Click to show full abstract
PurposePatient specific selection of cochlear implants would benefit from pre-operative knowledge of cochlear length. Several methods for its measurement or estimation have been described in literature. This study focused on the achievable accuracy in clinically available imaging.MethodsFive simplified cochlea models milled into porcine bone were scanned in water using clinical cone beam computed tomography. Due to their well-known dimensions these phantoms served as gold standard for the length measurements. Each phantom was measured ten times using the custom software Comet. In addition, cochleae in ten image datasets taken indiscriminately from clinical routine were measured ten times each to test the precision under realistic conditions. The results were also compared to estimations based on the diameter of the basal turn (A value) as described in literature.ResultsMeasurement accuracy of the phantoms’ lengths was high (average error: − 0.2 mm; standard deviation: 0.3 mm). The pooled standard deviation for the measurements in clinical datasets was 0.6 mm. Errors resulted mainly from problems locating the helicotrema. The estimations differed on average − 1.7 to + 0.4 mm from the manual measurements and had standard deviations between 0.5 and 0.6 mm depending on the algorithm.ConclusionsThe program Comet was successfully used to accurately measure the length of the cochlea models in clinically available imaging. The lower image quality of patient scans reduced the precision of the measurement. Estimations using the A value are a quicker alternative for averagely sized cochleae in cases where the lack of accuracy is tolerable.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.