LAUSR

Purpose Despite the evolution of the endoscopic techniques for the treatment of symptomatic Zenker diverticulum, comparative studies are lacking. Aim of this observational study was to compare safety, efficacy, and outcomes of endoscopic stapling (ES) versus Laser (EL). Methods A prospectively collected database of patients who underwent treatment for Zenker diverticulum at a single institution was reviewed. Consecutive patients treated by ES or EL were included in the study. Demographic data, presenting symptoms, diverticulum characteristics, and intra- and postoperative data were analyzed. The Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS) and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaires were administered to assess severity of dysphagia and quality of life before and after treatment. Results Between March 2017 and September 2018, 36 patients underwent ES or EL. In the TL group ( n  = 19), the diverticulum size was smaller compared to the EL group ( n  = 17) ( p  = 0.002). Two perforations occurred in the EL group, one treated conservatively and the other requiring drainage of a mediastinal abscess. At a median follow-up of 16 months, symptoms improved in both groups but the number of patients with a postoperative FOSS score ≥ 2 significantly decreased only after EL ( p  < 0.001). The scores of all items of the MDADI questionnaire significantly increased in both groups, but the average delta values were greater in the EL patients ( p  < 0.001). Conclusions Both TL and ES are effective treatment options for Zenker diverticulum. Postoperative quality of life was significantly higher in patients undergoing EL compared to ES.