LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept following treat and extend protocol for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Photo from wikipedia

PurposeTo assess the morphological and functional outcome and stability of the “treat and extend” protocol using aflibercept compared to ranibizumab for the treatment of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Patients… Click to show full abstract

PurposeTo assess the morphological and functional outcome and stability of the “treat and extend” protocol using aflibercept compared to ranibizumab for the treatment of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Patients and methodsThis retrospective study included 100 eyes of 94 patients with primary onset neovascular age-related macular degeneration followed up for 12 months. We studied two groups of eyes: group 1, 50 eyes treated with 0.5 mg/0.05 mL ranibizumab and group 2, 50 eyes treated with 2.0 mg/0.05 mL aflibercept. During the first year, all eyes received 3 aflibercept or ranibizumab injections monthly as upload phase. Then, eyes were treated with a treat and extend algorithm. Main outcome measures included: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and the number of injections. In addition, we compared recurrence rates between the two groups.ResultsBCVA (log MAR) in group 1 vs group 2 was 0.54 ± 0.31 vs 0.49 ± 0.30 (p = 0.38) before treatment and 0.49 ± 0.33 vs 0.47 ± 0.32 (p = 0.85) after treatment. The visual improvement (decimal) was 0.05 ± 0.13 vs 0.04 ± 0.12 (p = 0.91). CMT in group 1 vs group 2 was 375.6 ± 98.3 μm vs 369.6 ± 103.7 μm (p = 0.73) before treatment and 306.3 ± 71.8 μm vs 294.8 ± 96 μm (p = 0.54) after treatment. The decrease in CMT was 69.3 ± 93 μm vs 74.8 ± 96 μm (p = 0.77). The number of injections/eye after upload phase in group 1 vs group 2 was 5.88 ± 1.4 vs 6.16 ± 1.3 (p = 0.25). Finally, major recurrence rates were statistically significantly different between the two groups (2% vs 6%, p = 0.04).ConclusionsSignificant differences regarding BCVA, central macular thickness, and the number of injections were not found between aflibercept and ranibizumab during the first year following the treat and extend protocol. However, the significantly higher major recurrence rates in the aflibercept group after extending the treatment interval to 10 weeks might suggest that aflibercept should better not to be used in longer than 8 weeks intervals during the first year of treatment.

Keywords: age related; treatment; extend protocol; group; treat extend; neovascular age

Journal Title: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.