The aim of this study is to analyse the extent to which research and knowledge production on a key occupational health issue—the impact of precarious employment on health—incorporates, and is… Click to show full abstract
The aim of this study is to analyse the extent to which research and knowledge production on a key occupational health issue—the impact of precarious employment on health—incorporates, and is sensitive to, a gender perspective. A systematic literature review was carried out to identify studies that analysed the relationship between precarious employment and mental health in the period January 2010–May 2018 through. A minimum of two independent reviewers assessed each article for quality and eligibility. A checklist was used to determine whether the articles included in the review incorporated a gender perspective. The search retrieved 1522 papers, of which 54 (corresponding to 53 studies) met the inclusion criteria. Of these 54 papers, 22 (40.7%) stratified the analyses by sex. Only 5.4% of the total of articles both stratified by sex and considered variables of household composition and marital status, while only 33.3% incorporated an intersectional perspective. None considered the distribution of domestic work and only a quarter (25.9%) approached the study and interpreted the results in terms of gender. Too few studies researching paid work and health include a gender perspective. This omission necessarily implies a biased interpretation of the reality of precarious employment and its impact on health.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.