LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Minimum Scanline-to-Fracture Angle and Sample Size Required to Produce a Highly Accurate Estimate of the 3-D Fracture Orientation Distribution

Photo by nci from unsplash

Accurate estimates of the three-dimensional (3-D) rock fracture orientation distribution are crucial for generating a reliable fracture system model. Although an earlier method by Fouché and Diebolt allows one to… Click to show full abstract

Accurate estimates of the three-dimensional (3-D) rock fracture orientation distribution are crucial for generating a reliable fracture system model. Although an earlier method by Fouché and Diebolt allows one to estimate such distributions from one-dimensional (1-D) samples, this method does not typically produce highly accurate estimates of the 3-D orientation distribution (HAE3DOD). In this study, the minimum scanline-to-fracture angle (minimum θ) and the minimum orientation sample size (minimum n) required to produce HAE3DOD are investigated. Firstly, the factors significantly influencing minimum θ and minimum n are identified, and the influence clarified. For minimum θ, the possible influencing factors include the orientation concentration parameter (к) and n, while for minimum n, the possible influencing factors include к and θ. Fractures from three selected sites in China provide sufficient data for this investigation. The investigation results reveal that minimum θ varies almost linearly with к and n. Moreover, minimum n varies linearly with к and θ. Variations in the minimum θ and minimum n values are strongly associated with discrepancies in sample density resulting from different values of these factors. To ease the estimation of minimum θ and minimum n, empirical relations that take into account the separate factors are proposed for these two variables. A practical example demonstrates that the proposed relations accurately and efficiently estimate minimum θ and minimum n and can provide sampling guidelines (i.e., the intervals of scanline direction and sample size) for producing HAE3DOD. The potential limitations of the proposed relations are also discussed.

Keywords: minimum minimum; sample size; orientation distribution; fracture

Journal Title: Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.