LAUSR

BackgroundThe interoptic triangle (IOT) offers a key access to the contralateral carotid artery’s ophthalmic segment (oICA) and its perforating branches (PB), the ophthalmic artery (OA), and the superior hypophyseal artery (SHA). It has been previously reported that the assessment of IOT’s size is relevant when attempting approaches to the contralateral oICA. However, previous studies have overseen that, since the oICA is a paramedian structure and a lateralized contralateral approach trajectory is then required, the real access to the oICA is further limited by the approach angle adopted by the surgeon with respect to the IOT’s plane. For this reason, we determined the surgical accessibility to the contralateral oICA and its branches though the IOT by characterizing the morphometry of this triangle relative to the optimal contralateral approach angle.MethodsWe defined the “relative interoptic triangle” (rIOT) as the two-dimensional projection of the IOT to the surgeon’s view, when the microscope has been positioned with a certain angle with respect to the midline to allow the maximal contralateral oICA visualization. We correlated the surface of the rIOT to the visualization of oICA, OA, SHA, and PBs on 8 cadavers and 10 clinical datasets, using for the last a 3D-virtual reality system.ResultsA larger rIOT correlated positively with the exposure of the contralateral oICA (R = 0.967, p < 0.001), OA (R = 0.92, p < 0.001), SHA (R = 0.917, p < 0.001), and the number of perforant vessels of the oICA visible (R = 0.862, p < 0.001). The exposed length of oICA, OA, SHA, and number PB observed increased as rIOT’s surface enlarged. The correlation patterns observed by virtual 3D-planning matched the anatomical findings closely.ConclusionsThe exposure of contralateral oICA, OA, SHA, and PB directly correlates to rIOT’s surface. Therefore, preoperative assessment of rIOT’s surface is helpful when considering contralateral approaches to the oICA. A virtual 3D planning tool greatly facilitates this assessment.