LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Assessing the efficacy of a structured stress management program in reducing stress and climacteric symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women

Photo by papaioannou_kostas from unsplash

To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education program on lifestyle habits, which is also incorporating teaching on deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and guided visualization, in the control of… Click to show full abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education program on lifestyle habits, which is also incorporating teaching on deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and guided visualization, in the control of various components of the climacteric symptomatology in peri- and postmenopausal women. Sixty-one women aged 40–65 years with varying climacteric and stress symptoms were included in this study. Women were randomly assigned to the intervention group (31) or the control group (30). The intervention group followed an 8-week stress management program. The following parameters were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 8-week follow-up period in both groups: climacteric symptoms (Green Climacteric Scale (GCS)), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)), mood status (Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale), self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale), and health-related control (health locus of control (HLC)). A mixed-model ANOVA showed significant time × group × GCS interaction (within subjects: F = 23.830, p value<0.001; between subjects: F = 39.078, p value<0.001). With regard to HLC, there was a non-significant between subjects but a significant within-subjects effect (HLC × group × time, F = 3.848, p value = 0.024). Regarding DASS scores, there was a significant between-subjects’ effect (F = 10.258, p value = 0.003) but a non-significant within-subjects’ effect. With regard to PSQI, the analysis showed significant within-subjects’ effects (PSQI × group × time: F = 4.691, p value = 0.003) and non-significant between-subjects’ effects (F = 0.022, p = 0.883). Finally, regarding RSS, there was a significant within-subjects’ (RSS × group × time, F = 4.183, p value = 0.029) but non-significant between-subjects’ effect (F = 1.582, p value = 0.213). Stress management may offer an alternative approach to the management of climacteric symptoms.

Keywords: within subjects; group; value; stress management; climacteric symptoms

Journal Title: Archives of Women's Mental Health
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.