Photo from wikipedia
The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained an error. The above article originally published with an error present in the 9-valent dose listed within the abstract. Originally reading B...For… Click to show full abstract
The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained an error. The above article originally published with an error present in the 9-valent dose listed within the abstract. Originally reading B...For the 9-valent dose, our calculated number needed to seriously harm is 140 (95% CI, 796–53)...^, this should instead have read B...For the 9-valent dose, our calculated number needed to seriously harm is 140 (95% CI, 79–653)...^ [bold text used to highlight problem area]. The original article was corrected.
Journal Title: Clinical Rheumatology
Year Published: 2017
Link to full text (if available)
Share on Social Media: Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!