LAUSR

PurposeTo evaluate the utility of virtual monoenergetic imaging in assessing hepatic and splenic lacerations and to determine the optimal energy level to maximize injury contrast-to-noise ratio.MethodsWe retrospectively examined 49 contrast-enhanced abdominal CT studies performed on a dual-source dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner with reported liver and/or splenic lacerations. All studies included portal venous phase imaging acquired simultaneously at low (80 or 100 kVp) and high (140 kVp with tin filtration) energy levels. Conventional 120 kVp-equivalent images were generated for routine review by blending the low and high energy acquisitions. Virtual monoenergetic reconstructions were retrospectively generated in 10 keV increments from 40 to 90 keV. Liver or splenic laceration attenuation, background parenchymal attenuation, and noise were measured on each set of monoenergetic and conventional images. Injury-to-parenchyma contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated. Differences between CNR of monoenergetic series and conventional images were assessed with a paired t test.ResultsLiver laceration was identified in 28 patients, and splenic laceration in 22 patients. Background noise was lower at higher monoenergetic levels, with the lowest noise seen at 90 keV, less than that of conventional images (stddev 8.0 for 90 keV and 8.5 for conventional based on noise of uninjured liver/spleen parenchyma, p < 0.001). For both liver and splenic lacerations, injury-to-parenchyma contrast was greater at lower monoenergetic levels, with maximum at 40 keV. Contrast at 40–70 keV was significantly greater than that of conventional images (p < 0.001). Injury-to parenchyma CNR was also greater at 40–70 keV than that of conventional images and with statistical significance. CNR was highest at 40 keV for both liver (6.5 for 40 keV and 5.4 for conventional, p < 0.001) and splenic lacerations (7.5 vs. 5.8, p < 0.001).ConclusionsDECT virtual monoenergetic imaging at low keV improves injury-to-parenchyma CNR of hepatic and splenic lacerations compared with traditional polyenergetic reconstructions. Specially, the optimal energy level for assessing both was 40 keV.