LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Effect of actual age on outcome at discharge in patients by surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for ruptured cerebral aneurysm in Japan

Photo from wikipedia

The Japanese population features the highest rate of elderly individuals worldwide. However, the difference of actual age indication for surgical clipping (SC) and endovascular coiling (EC) has never reported. We… Click to show full abstract

The Japanese population features the highest rate of elderly individuals worldwide. However, the difference of actual age indication for surgical clipping (SC) and endovascular coiling (EC) has never reported. We clarified the effect of actual age on poor outcome at discharge in patients by each treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysm according to the Japanese Stroke Data Bank. A total of 3593 patients with ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysm were treated by SC and/or EC between 2000 and 2013. The effect of actual age on poor outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score > 2) at discharge was evaluated by the cutoff age using receiver operating characteristic analysis for each treatment. There were 2666 cases in the SC group and 881 cases in the EC group. The cutoff age for poor outcome was 3 to 9 years older for EC than for SC. The gap of cutoff age between two treatments was 3 years shorter in mild subarachnoid hemorrhage than severe cases. The gap of cutoff age between two treatments was 7 years in elderly patients over 65 years old. The cutoff age was 78 years old for both SC and EC in elderly female patients. In conclusion, the cutoff age for poor mRS score > 2 was 3 to 9 years older for EC than for SC. Actual age was one of the indications for elderly patients to achieve the optimum outcome; however, the treatment indication should be carefully considered based on the condition in each country.

Keywords: cutoff age; age; cerebral aneurysm; actual age; effect actual

Journal Title: Neurosurgical Review
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.