Correct identification of the internal opening is essential in the management of perianal fistulae. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of Goodsall’s Law and the Midline… Click to show full abstract
Correct identification of the internal opening is essential in the management of perianal fistulae. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of Goodsall’s Law and the Midline Rule in predicting the path of perianal fistula-in-ano and the location of the internal opening using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. An observational study including patients diagnosed with fistula-in-ano, at our institution from January 2006 to December 2020 was performed. Location and distance from the anal verge of the external opening, internal opening, and the path of the fistulous tract were recorded during physical examination and endoanal ultrasound. Goodsall’s and Midline rules were applied to all fistulae according to the location of the external opening. The location of the internal opening as predicted by either rule was then compared to the real location of the internal opening identified during endoanal ultrasound examination. Nine hundred and nine patients [657 (72.3%) males, mean age 50.78 (49.84–51.72) years] were included. 665 (73.2%) of fistulae were transsphinteric. Concordance between predicted internal opening site and the true internal opening location was 0.601 (good match) for Goodsall’s rule, and 0.416 (moderate match) for the Midline rule. Goodsall’s rule proved to be more predictive in the anterior plane (p < 0.001). Both rules were more likely to make a correct diagnosis in posterior fistulae located 4.5–7.5 mm from the anal verge. Both Midline and Goodsall’s rules are highly predictive of the course of fistula tracts located in the posterior plane, and are lower for anterior located fistulae, female patients and when the external opening is located further from the anal verge.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.