LAUSR

Various approaches for estimating the flow rate of a rotary blood pump have been proposed for monitoring and control purposes. They have been evaluated under different test conditions and, therefore, a direct comparison among them is difficult. Furthermore, a limited performance has been reported for the areas where the pump flow and motor current present a non-monotonic relationship. In this regard, we selected most approaches that have been presented in literature and added a modified one, resulting in four estimators, which are either non-invasive or invasive, i.e., inlet and outlet pump pressure sensors are used. Data from in vitro and in vivo studies with the Deltastream pump DP2 were used to compare the estimators under the same test conditions. These data included both constant and varying pre- and afterload, contractility, viscosity, as well as pump speed settings. Bland–Altman plots were used to evaluate the performance of the estimators. The mean error of the overall estimated flow in vitro ranged from 0.002 to 0.38 L/min and the limits of agreement (LoA) between ± 2 L/min. During negative flows the mean error decreased by about 25% when the pump inlet pressure was added as an input. In vivo, the mean errors increased, while the LoA remained in the same range. An estimator based on pump pressure difference improves the reliability in areas where flow and current relationship is not monotonic. A trade-off between estimation accuracy and number of sensors was identified. The estimation objective and the potential errors should be considered when selecting an estimation approach and designing the pump systems.