LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Futures Hedging in CSI 300 Markets: A Comparison Between Minimum-Variance and Maximum-Utility Frameworks

Photo by hodneirik from unsplash

In this paper, we explore the hedging performance of CSI 300 stock index futures under the minimum-variance and maximum-utility framework. We employ ten commonly used econometric models including constant and… Click to show full abstract

In this paper, we explore the hedging performance of CSI 300 stock index futures under the minimum-variance and maximum-utility framework. We employ ten commonly used econometric models including constant and dynamic ones. Our empirical results indicate that for all futures contracts none of the single model can outperform all other models out-of-sample. In general, the dynamic hedge ratio models are significantly superior to the constant hedge ratio models under the both frameworks in CSI 300 market. Further we obtain the most robust hedging effectiveness by combining OHRs from dynamic hedge models.

Keywords: minimum variance; variance maximum; csi 300; maximum utility

Journal Title: Computational Economics
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.