LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Authors’ Reply: A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis

Photo by dawson2406 from unsplash

In this Reply we will discuss the reason why we left out a scenario where missingness is dependent of the outcome and show that our simulation results are consistent when… Click to show full abstract

In this Reply we will discuss the reason why we left out a scenario where missingness is dependent of the outcome and show that our simulation results are consistent when there is a non-null treatment effect. Regarding the first point, we agree with the authors that a complete case analysis will results in bias when data are missing at random and the missingness in covariates is dependent on the outcome. This can also be shown in a missingness graph (Fig. 1a). In this scenario, a complete case analysis will result in bias since the missing indicator R and the outcome Y cannot be d-separated. In fact, complete case analysis will result in bias in any situation when missingness in covariates (R) and the outcome (Y) cannot be conditionally d-separated even when the treatment effect is homogeneous. This can happen in three different scenarios:

Keywords: authors reply; analysis; reply comparison; complete case; case analysis; missingness

Journal Title: European Journal of Epidemiology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.