In this Reply we will discuss the reason why we left out a scenario where missingness is dependent of the outcome and show that our simulation results are consistent when… Click to show full abstract
In this Reply we will discuss the reason why we left out a scenario where missingness is dependent of the outcome and show that our simulation results are consistent when there is a non-null treatment effect. Regarding the first point, we agree with the authors that a complete case analysis will results in bias when data are missing at random and the missingness in covariates is dependent on the outcome. This can also be shown in a missingness graph (Fig. 1a). In this scenario, a complete case analysis will result in bias since the missing indicator R and the outcome Y cannot be d-separated. In fact, complete case analysis will result in bias in any situation when missingness in covariates (R) and the outcome (Y) cannot be conditionally d-separated even when the treatment effect is homogeneous. This can happen in three different scenarios:
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.