On a widely suggested knowledge-first account of belief, to believe p is to $$\Phi $$ (e.g. treat p) as if one knew p. I challenge this view by arguing against… Click to show full abstract
On a widely suggested knowledge-first account of belief, to believe p is to $$\Phi $$ (e.g. treat p) as if one knew p. I challenge this view by arguing against various regimentations of it. I conclude by generalizing my argument to alternative knowledge-first views suggested by Williamson and Wimmer.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.