Using dyadic data from a random sample of dual-earner couples from an upper Midwestern city in the US (N = 99), this study examined how each partner’s strain and support from family,… Click to show full abstract
Using dyadic data from a random sample of dual-earner couples from an upper Midwestern city in the US (N = 99), this study examined how each partner’s strain and support from family, partner, and friends relate to work-family conflict. The findings showed several significant relationships. Among men, friend support was associated with lower work-to-family conflict and higher family-to-work conflict, whereas partner support was related to lower family-to-work conflict. Partner strain was associated with work-to-family conflict among women and family-to-work conflict among men. Men’s friend support was related to less work-to-family conflict among women, and women’s family support was associated with less family-to-work conflict among men. Men’s friend strain was associated with higher family-to-work conflict among women. The implications of these findings were discussed, with an eye towards identifying theoretical and practical implications of this study.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.