LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Tighter price of anarchy for selfish task allocation on selfish machines

Photo by donovan_valdivia from unsplash

Given a set $$L = \{J_1,J_2,\ldots ,J_n\}$$ of n tasks and a set $$M = \{M_1,M_2, \ldots ,M_m\}$$ of m identical machines, in which tasks and machines are possessed by… Click to show full abstract

Given a set $$L = \{J_1,J_2,\ldots ,J_n\}$$ of n tasks and a set $$M = \{M_1,M_2, \ldots ,M_m\}$$ of m identical machines, in which tasks and machines are possessed by different selfish clients. Each selfish client of machine $$M_i \in M$$ gets a profit equal to its load and each selfish client of task allocated to $$M_i$$ suffers from a cost equal to the load of $$M_i$$. Our aim is to allocate the tasks on the m machines so as to minimize the maximum completion times of the tasks on each machine. A stable allocation is referred to as a dual equilibrium (DE). We firstly show that 4/3 is tight upper bound of the Price of Anarchy(PoA) with respect to dual equilibrium for $$m\in \{3,\ldots ,9\}$$. And secondly $$(7m-6)/(5m-3)$$ is an upper bound for $$m\ge 10$$. The result is better than the existing bound of 7/5.

Keywords: task; price anarchy; anarchy selfish; allocation; tighter price

Journal Title: Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.