LAUSR

In adiabatic thermal analysis, correct measurement of temperature is usually ensured by means of a calibration procedure and thermal inertia corrections. However, there is a significant gradient within system, which not only makes the obtained test results inaccurate, but also causes serious errors in subsequent kinetic calculations and thermal risk assessment. Thus, estimations of the temperature gradients, which appear into the sample, are of highest interest to choose the right operational conditions that minimize that gradient. In this work, the CFD software has been applied to study this temperature gradient issue in adiabatic system. In view of the causes of temperature gradients, the influencing factors and the resulting analysis errors are all deeply researched. In addition, three different kinds of adiabaticity control model cases have also been simulated to explore the right operational conditions that minimize gradient and provide more reliable kinetics and thermal hazard parameters (Q∞, k0, Ea, n, TD24, TCL). After a comparative study, the authors define the more reliable operational conditions, which include selecting a suitable temperature response value and the adiabatic temperature control model. Finally, the reliability of the adiabaticity control model that achieves the minimum temperature gradients and provides the most accurate calculation results was verified through the different adiabatic tests.