LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Two precautions of entropy-weighting model in drought-risk assessment

Photo by sammiechaffin from unsplash

Two disadvantages of the entropy-weighting model (EWM) in drought-risk assessment are presented through two typical examples in this paper. (1) For distortion in the normalization process, entropy defined by EWM… Click to show full abstract

Two disadvantages of the entropy-weighting model (EWM) in drought-risk assessment are presented through two typical examples in this paper. (1) For distortion in the normalization process, entropy defined by EWM cannot represent the indicator’s dipartite degree correctly when too many zero values exist in the observation data. (2) Given that EWM neglects the indicator’s practical significance in drought-risk assessment, the indicator’s dipartite degree cannot correctly represent its importance when observation data are concentrated in the worst category. These two problems lead to unjustified drought-risk assessment results. Therefore, the features of observation data should be checked before weighting. If the indicator’s observation values are concentrated in the worst domain or numerous zero values exist, then EWM should be applied cautiously.

Keywords: risk assessment; entropy weighting; drought risk

Journal Title: Natural Hazards
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.