LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of Cylindrical Interplanetary Flux-Rope Model Fitting with Different Boundary Pitch-Angle Treatments

Photo from wikipedia

Interplanetary flux ropes (IFRs) observed in the solar wind have been investigated through application of the Lundquist model, which is a cylindrical flux-rope model with a constant-α$\alpha $ force-free magnetic-field… Click to show full abstract

Interplanetary flux ropes (IFRs) observed in the solar wind have been investigated through application of the Lundquist model, which is a cylindrical flux-rope model with a constant-α$\alpha $ force-free magnetic-field model. This study evaluated two Lundquist-model fitting methods by applying them to magnetic-obstacle (MO) events observed by the Wind and Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft and by comparing the results. In one method, the pitch angle of the magnetic field at the IFR boundary is assumed to be 90∘$90^{\circ}$, whereas in the other method this restriction is relaxed and the pitch angle is handled as a free parameter [αp$\alpha _{\mathrm{p}} $]. We found that the angle between the axial and radial directions in radial tangential normal (RTN) coordinates (cone angle) and the magnetic flux of the IFR were significantly different for approximately 30% of these events. However, both methods yielded similar values for the direction of the IFR axis projected onto the T–N plane in the RTN coordinates (tilt angle). We also found that the statistical distribution of αp$\alpha _{\mathrm{p}}$, which was estimated using the generalized method, shows a spread of 34∘$34^{\circ}$ centered at 82∘$82^{\circ}$, implying that a highly twisted magnetic-field line surrounds the surface of the IFR for approximately 60% of the events. On the other hand, it was noted that a significant number of events (approximately 25%) have a small αp$\alpha _{\mathrm{p}}$ (<60∘${<}\,60^{\circ}$). These results prove that it is better to use the generalized method than the conventional method for solving the cone angle, magnetic flux, or pitch angle of the flux rope, which would lead to a more accurate derivation of the properties of IFRs.

Keywords: flux rope; model; flux; pitch angle

Journal Title: Solar Physics
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.