LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

The Conservativity of Many: Split Scope and Most

Photo from archive.org

Besides their cardinal and proportional readings, many and few have been argued to allow for a ‘reverse’ proportional reading that defies the conservativity universal (Westerståhl in Ling Philos 8:387−413, 1985).… Click to show full abstract

Besides their cardinal and proportional readings, many and few have been argued to allow for a ‘reverse’ proportional reading that defies the conservativity universal (Westerståhl in Ling Philos 8:387−413, 1985). Recently, an analysis has been developed that derives the correct truth conditions for this reading while preserving conservativity (Romero, in Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, Amsterdam, 2015; Romero, On the reverse proportional reading of many, 2016a, submitted). The present paper investigates two predictions of this analysis, based on two key ingredients. First, many is decomposed into a determiner stem many and the degree operator POS. This predicts that other elements may scopally intervene between the two parts. Second, non-reverse and reverse readings arise from the versatile association possibilities of POS, as independently witnessed in the grammar. In languages in which the same versatile association profile is granted to the superlative degree operator -est, reverse readings are expected to arise for most as well. Both predictions are borne out.

Keywords: conservativity many; many split; reverse; split scope; conservativity

Journal Title: Topoi
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.