PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate the role of curative treatment in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and to identify the subgroup having benefit from curative treatment.MethodsFrom April 2000 to December 2014,… Click to show full abstract
PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate the role of curative treatment in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and to identify the subgroup having benefit from curative treatment.MethodsFrom April 2000 to December 2014, 100 patients with intermediate-stage HCCs underwent either curative treatment (hepatectomy: n = 23, radiofrequency ablation (RFA); n = 29, both: n = 4) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE): n = 44) as initial treatments for HCCs. Overall survival, influence of treatment allocation on prognosis, and factors affecting treatment allocation were evaluated.ResultsThe 5-year survival rate was 59.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.6–66.8%] in the curative group, and 25.1% (95% CI 11.5–38.7%) in the TACE group. Treatment allocation was the only significant prognostic factor (p = 0.014, hazard ratio: 0.382, 95% CI 0.177–0.821). The curative group consisted of more patients with Child-Pugh A (p = 0.0016) than the TACE group, a tumor number of 3 or fewer (p < 0.0001), a unilobar tumor location (p = 0.02), within 4 of 7 cm criterion (p = 0.001), and within up-to-7 criterion (p = 0.04). Child-Pugh A, within the 4 of 7 cm criterion, and a unilobar tumor location were significantly linked with treatment allocation in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsCurative treatment can prolong survival in selected patients with intermediate-stage HCCs.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.