LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

A Coaching by Telephone Intervention on Engaging Patients to Address Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Photo from wikipedia

BackgroundA large proportion of deaths and chronic illnesses can be attributed to three modifiable risk factors: tobacco use, overweight/obesity, and physical inactivity.ObjectiveTo test whether telephone-based health coaching after completion of… Click to show full abstract

BackgroundA large proportion of deaths and chronic illnesses can be attributed to three modifiable risk factors: tobacco use, overweight/obesity, and physical inactivity.ObjectiveTo test whether telephone-based health coaching after completion of a comprehensive health risk assessment (HRA) increases patient activation and enrollment in a prevention program compared to HRA completion alone.DesignTwo-arm randomized trial at three sites.SettingPrimary care clinics at Veterans Affairs facilities.ParticipantsFour hundred seventeen veterans with at least one modifiable risk factor (BMI ≥ 30, < 150 min of at least moderate physically activity per week, or current smoker).InterventionParticipants completed an online HRA. Intervention participants received two telephone-delivered health coaching calls at 1 and 4 weeks to collaboratively set goals to enroll in, and attend structured prevention programs designed to reduce modifiable risk factors.MeasurementsPrimary outcome was enrollment in a structured prevention program by 6 months. Secondary outcomes were Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Framingham Risk Score (FRS).ResultsMost participants were male (85%), white (50%), with a mean age of 56. Participants were eligible, because their BMI was ≥ 30 (80%), they were physically inactive (50%), and/or they were current smokers (39%). When compared to HLA only at 6 months, health coaching intervention participants reported higher rates of enrollment in a prevention program, 51 vs 29% (OR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.9; p < 0.0001), higher rates of program participation, 40 vs 23% (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5, 3.6; p = 0.0004), and greater improvement in PAM scores, mean difference 2.5 (95% CI: 0.2, 4.7; p = 0.03), but no change in FRS scores, mean difference 0.7 (95% CI − 0.7, 2.2; p = 0.33).ConclusionsBrief telephone health coaching after completing an online HRA increased patient activation and increased enrollment in structured prevention programs to improve health behaviors.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01828567

Keywords: intervention; risk; risk factors; telephone; health; prevention

Journal Title: Journal of General Internal Medicine
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.