Background Medical scribes have been proposed as a solution to the problems of excessive documentation, work-life balance, and burnout facing general internists. However, their acceptability to patients and effects on… Click to show full abstract
Background Medical scribes have been proposed as a solution to the problems of excessive documentation, work-life balance, and burnout facing general internists. However, their acceptability to patients and effects on provider experience have not been tested in a real-world model of effectiveness. Objective To measure the effect of medical scribes on patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction, and provider productivity. Design Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences longitudinal design. Participants Four attending physicians who worked with scribes, 9 control physicians who did not, and their patients in a large, hospital-affiliated academic general internal medicine practice. Main Measures Provider experience and patient experience using 5-point Likert scale surveys from the AMA Steps Forward Team Documentation Module, and visits and wRVUs per hour during 4 weeks before and 12 weeks after initiation of a practice model that included use of scribes and a shortened visit template. Key Results Participating providers worked a total of 664 clinic sessions and returned 547 (82%) surveys. Average provider experience scores did not differ between providers working with scribes and control providers working without (4.01 vs. 3.40 respectively; p time-by-group interaction = 0.26). Providers with scribes were more likely to agree that work for the encounter would be completed during the visit then controls (3.58 vs. 2.48 respectively; p interaction = 0.04). A total of 6202 visits occurred during the study period. Average patient experience scores did not differ between the experimental and control groups (4.73 vs. 4.75 respectively; p interaction = 0.90). Compared with the control providers, providers with scribes completed more visits per hour (2.29 vs. 1.91; p interaction < 0.001) and generated more wRVUs per hour (3.42 vs. 3.27; p interaction < 0.001). Conclusions In this test of a modified practice model, scribes supported greater patient throughput and improved provider perceptions of documentation burden with no decrement in high patient satisfaction.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.