LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comment on “The pros and cons of continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections of insulin”. Authors’ reply

Photo from wikipedia

We are grateful to Dr. Frontino and colleagues for their comments [1] and interest in our work [2]. We acknowledge that type 1 diabetic patients treated with multiple daily injections… Click to show full abstract

We are grateful to Dr. Frontino and colleagues for their comments [1] and interest in our work [2]. We acknowledge that type 1 diabetic patients treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may benefit from the use of glucose rate of change (ROC) arrows to make insulin dose adjustments. ROC arrows indicate the direction and velocity of changing glucose, reflecting a combination of recent glucose readings. However, at least three glycemic measurements in the last 15 min are required to describe the glycemic trend. In order to make safe therapeutic decisions, the information on the velocity of changing glucose should be integrated with that coming from the trend graph and glycemic measurements by self-blood glucose monitoring. It remains to be clarified whether non-adjunctive use of CGM may be considered a valid tool to make treatment decisions. As Frontino pointed out, the forthcoming availability of more accurate sensors, with mean absolute relative difference (MARD) below 10%, will provide an important opportunity to monitor glucose levels and adjust therapy with CGM. In the REPLACE-BG trial [3], which randomized 226 type 1 diabetic adults to CGM-only or to CGM plus self blood glucose monitoring (SBGM), mean time in euglycemia (glucose values between 70-180 mg/dL) was similar in both groups. However, patients in the CGM-only group needed to perform at least 2.8 SBGM tests per day (mainly to calibrate the sensor), as compared with 5.4 tests of patients in CGM plus SBGM group. Moreover, confirmatory capillary glucose measurements are still required to make therapy adjustments when glucose alerts and readings do not match symptoms or expectations, or in the concomitant assumption of interfering substances, including paracetamol and acetaminophen (www.dexcom.com/enGB). At present, among CGM system, only the Dexcom G5 has been approved for non-adjunctive use in Europe. The flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system, which does not require calibration, offers an alternative glucose monitoring strategy that simultaneously analyzes glucose profile while sparing patients the inconvenience of capillary glucose testing for therapy adjustment or CGM calibration.

Keywords: daily injections; multiple daily; cgm; monitoring; glucose monitoring; continuous glucose

Journal Title: Endocrine
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.