The agronomic performances of giant miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) grown as bioenergy grasses are still unclear in North Carolina, due to a relatively short period… Click to show full abstract
The agronomic performances of giant miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) grown as bioenergy grasses are still unclear in North Carolina, due to a relatively short period of introduction. The objectives of the study were to compare the biomass yield and annual N removal of perennial bioenergy grasses and the commonly grown coastal bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], and to determine the optimum N rates and harvest practices for switchgrass and miscanthus. A 4-year field trial of the grasses under five annual harvest frequencies (May/Oct, June/Oct, July/Oct, Aug/Oct, and October only) and five annual N rates (0, 67,134, 202, and 268 kg N ha−1) was established at a research farm in Eastern North Carolina in 2011. Across harvest treatments and N rates, greatest biomass was achieved in the second growth year for both miscanthus (19.0 Mg ha−1) and switchgrass (15.9 Mg ha−1). Grasses demonstrated no N response until the second or the third year after crop establishment. Miscanthus reached a yield plateau with a N rate of 134 kg ha−1 since achieving plant maturity in 2013, whereas switchgrass demonstrated an increasing fertilizer N response from 134 kg N ha−1 in the third growth year (2014) to 268 kg N ha−1 in the fourth growth year (2015). The two-cut harvest system is not recommended for bioenergy biomass production in this region because it does not improve biomass yield and increased N removal leads to additional costs.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.