LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

CME instructions: Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Photo from archive.org

(1) Studies employing meta-analytic techniques to answer clinical questions are growing exponentially. (2) Given the complex methodology, there is a need to acquaint clinicians with modern-day methodological standards for conducting… Click to show full abstract

(1) Studies employing meta-analytic techniques to answer clinical questions are growing exponentially. (2) Given the complex methodology, there is a need to acquaint clinicians with modern-day methodological standards for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (3) Although considered to generate the highest level of evidence, meta-analyses have been subjected to criticisms about their validity and place in clinical evidence-based medicine. (4) There is a need to address the quality and limitations of these studies.

Keywords: meta analyses; reviews meta; quality; cme instructions; systematic reviews; instructions conducting

Journal Title: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.