Background ATTR cardiac amyloidosis (CA) can be diagnosed with Tc-99m-PYP scintigraphy. There are two recommended interpretative approaches: the quantitative heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (H/CL) at 1 hour and the semi-quantitative visual… Click to show full abstract
Background ATTR cardiac amyloidosis (CA) can be diagnosed with Tc-99m-PYP scintigraphy. There are two recommended interpretative approaches: the quantitative heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (H/CL) at 1 hour and the semi-quantitative visual system at 3 hours. This study’s aim was to compare both approaches and to apply the semi-quantitative method at 1 hour. Methods Tc-99m-PYP scans of 122 consecutive subjects were reviewed using both approaches. On 1 hour planar images, regions of interest were drawn over the heart and contralateral chest to determine H/CL. Myocardial uptake was graded on 1 and 3 hour SPECT images according to the semi-quantitative method. Concordance was examined using kappa statistics. Results 31, 10, and 81 studies were positive, negative, and equivocal, respectively, for ATTR-CA using the H/CL approach. Using the grading system, 35, 77, and 10 scans were positive, negative, and equivocal, respectively. The quantitative approach led to a significantly higher proportion of equivocal studies compared to the semi-quantitative approach ( P < .0001). These approaches yielded discordant results in 2 subjects; biopsy results were concordant with SPECT grade. 1 and 3 hour SPECT grades provided concordant result in 99% of cases. Conclusions The H/CL approach resulted in a high proportion of equivocal studies. Using SPECT imaging, the semi-quantitative approach minimized this proportion and showed high concordance at 1 and 3 hours.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.