Impregnating polymeric membranes with inorganic zeolite particles and organic carbon nanotube particles led to organic–inorganic nanocomposite membranes. In this work, nano-zeolite (NZ) and carbon nanotube (CNT) were used as nanofiller… Click to show full abstract
Impregnating polymeric membranes with inorganic zeolite particles and organic carbon nanotube particles led to organic–inorganic nanocomposite membranes. In this work, nano-zeolite (NZ) and carbon nanotube (CNT) were used as nanofiller materials, while poly(1-hexadecene-sulfone)/poly(1,4-phenylene sulfide) (PHS/PS) blend was used as matrix material. PHS/PS/NZ membranes have shown fine dispersion, although layered-particulate morphology was seen in PHS/PS/NZ–CNT 10 membrane. Tensile strength of PHS/PS/NZ 1–10 was 53–58 MPa, while PHS/PS/NZ–CNT 1–10 showed higher values 67–78 MPa. Young’s Modulus of PHS/PS/NZ 1–10 was 122.2–137.7 MPa, while PHS/PS/NZ–CNT 1–10 showed higher values 143.4–166.5 MPa. Moreover, the nano-zeolite/carbon nanotube (NZ–CNT) filler was found more effective than nano-zeolite in enhancing CO2 permeability and permselectivity. The permeability PCO2 of PHS/PS/NZ and PHS/PS/NZ–CNT membranes increased with increasing filler concentration and reached 177.3 Barrer at 10 wt% filler content. The permselectivity αCO2/N2 for PHS/PS/NZ–CNT 10 membrane (36.1 Barrer) was also higher than PHS/PS/NZ 10 (32.9 Barrer).
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.