Statistical models for measuring the impact of adverse weather conditions on pedestrian injuries are of great importance for enhancing road safety measures. The development of these models in the presence… Click to show full abstract
Statistical models for measuring the impact of adverse weather conditions on pedestrian injuries are of great importance for enhancing road safety measures. The development of these models in the presence of high collinearity among the weather conditions poses a real challenge in practice. The collinearity among these conditions may result in underestimation of the regression coefficients of the regression model, and hence inconsistency regarding the impact of the weather conditions on the pedestrian injuries counts. This paper presents a methodology through which the penalization-based regression is applied to model the impact of weather conditions on pedestrian injury in the presence of a high level of collinearity among these conditions. More specifically, the methodology integrates both the least absolute shrinkage squared operator (Lasso) with the cross-validation approach. The statistical performance of the proposed methodology is assessed through an analytical comparison involving the standard Poisson regression, Poisson generalized linear model (Poisson-GzLM), and Ridge penalized regression model. The mean squared error (MSE) was used as a criterion of comparison. In terms of the MSE, the Lasso-based Poisson generalized linear model (Lasso-GzLM) revealed an advantage over the other regression models. Moreover, the study revealed that weather conditions involved in this study are of insignificant impact on pedestrian injury counts.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.