Abstract15 symmetric 1-methyl-2,6-bis[2-(substituted phenyl)ethenyl]pyridinium iodides were synthesized in this work. Their structures were characterized using IR, 1H and 13C NMR, and UV–Vis spectroscopy. DFT calculations indicated that s-trans/s-trans conformation prevail… Click to show full abstract
Abstract15 symmetric 1-methyl-2,6-bis[2-(substituted phenyl)ethenyl]pyridinium iodides were synthesized in this work. Their structures were characterized using IR, 1H and 13C NMR, and UV–Vis spectroscopy. DFT calculations indicated that s-trans/s-trans conformation prevail in all compounds. The effects of specific and non-specific solvent–solute interactions on the UV–Vis absorption maxima shifts were evaluated using linear solvation-free energy relationships (LSER), i.e., Kamlet–Taft and Catalán models. A linear free energy relationship (LFER) in the form of single substituent parameter equations (SSP) was used to postulate quantitative structure–property relations of substituent effect on NMR data. TD-DFT results showed dependence of electronic transition on the substituent effects. The push–pull character of these compounds was analyzed by differences in 13C chemical shift of the ethylenic double bond in 2- and 6-positions of cross-conjugated with pyridinum central ring. Also, the quotient of the occupations for the bonding π and anti-bonding π* orbitals of this bond was considered. Good correlations of the selected parameter between double bond lengths with π*/π and 13C chemical shift differences of the bridging group proved them to be adequate descriptor of push–pull character. Synthesized compounds were screened for the antioxidant activity, using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical methods, and results demonstrated moderate antioxidant potential.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.