LAUSR

Background and PurposeCombination therapy with dipyridamole and clopidogrel in stroke prevention and long-term outcomes in aspirin-intolerant patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and previous stroke are unknown. This nationwide study analyzed the impact of dipyridamole and clopidogrel on secondary stroke prevention and long-term outcomes in aspirin-intolerant stroke patients after AMI.MethodsThis was a nationwide, case-control study involving 186,112 first AMI patients, 78,607 of whom had a previous history of stroke. In the final analysis, we included 4637 patients taking clopidogrel alone and 208 patients using a combination of clopidogrel and dipyridamole.ResultsThe 12-year survival rate was not different between clopidogrel and clopidogrel–dipyridamole groups (log-rank p = 0.6247). Furthermore, there were no differences in event-free survival after stroke (log-rank p = 0.6842), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (log-rank p = 0.9539), or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; log-rank p = 0.6191) between the two groups. Dipyridamole did not contribute significantly to AMI survival (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.84–1.15), and did not show benefits in any of the subgroups regardless of sex, age (younger or older than 75 years), comorbidities, percutaneous coronary intervention, or medications.ConclusionNo differences were observed in the 12-year survival rate between clopidogrel and clopidogrel–dipyridamole groups. The two groups had balanced event-free survival in recurrent stroke, ICH, GI bleeding, and myocardial infarction.