LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Incorporation of a patient navigator into a secondary fracture prevention program identifies barriers to patient care

Photo by rocinante_11 from unsplash

Introduction Patient navigation improves outcomes in various clinical contexts, but has not been evaluated in secondary fracture prevention. Methods We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients, age 50 + from April to October,… Click to show full abstract

Introduction Patient navigation improves outcomes in various clinical contexts, but has not been evaluated in secondary fracture prevention. Methods We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients, age 50 + from April to October, 2016 hospitalized with fragility fracture contacted by a patient navigator. Patients were identified using an electronic tool extracting data from electronic medical records which alerted the patient navigator to contact patients by phone post-discharge to schedule appointments to “High-Risk Osteoporosis Clinic” (HiROC) and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan. Primary outcome was transition from hospital to HiROC. We also compared completion of DXA, five osteoporosis-associated in-hospital laboratory tests (calcium, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, complete blood count, renal, and liver function), osteoporosis medication prescription and adherence, and other patient characteristics to historical controls (2014–2015) without patient navigation. Comparisons were made using Chi-square, Fisher’s Exact, two-sample t test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, as appropriate. Results The proportion of patients transitioning to HiROC with and without patient navigation was not different (53% vs. 48%, p  = 0.483), but DXA scan completion was higher (90% vs. 67%, p  = 0.006). No difference in medication initiation within 3 months post discharge (73% vs. 65%, p  = 0.387) or adherence at 6 months (68% vs. 71%, p  = 0.777) was found. Patients attending HiROC lived closer (11 vs. 43 miles, p  < 0.001) and more likely to follow-up in surgery clinic (95% vs. 61%, p  < 0.001). Conclusion Patient navigation did not improve transition to HiROC. Longer travel distance may be a barrier—unaffected by patient navigation. Identifying barriers may inform best practices for Fracture Liaison Service programs.

Keywords: patient navigator; patient navigation; fracture; patient

Journal Title: Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.