The purpose of this research is to determine if inappropriate NOAC prescribing is a significant problem and whether it is related to existing diseases, demographic-data, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED-scores, frailty and… Click to show full abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine if inappropriate NOAC prescribing is a significant problem and whether it is related to existing diseases, demographic-data, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED-scores, frailty and falls. Inappropriate NOAC prescribing is a common problem, and we suggest that dose reduction was performed only in the consideration of the age factor. No association was identified between inadequate dosing and falling or frailty. Inappropriate NOAC use is a significant problem, especially in older adults, and patients in this group are at greater risk of stroke. There has been a rapid increase in the use of non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). Current guidelines recommend dose adjustments be made in accordance with certain criteria for each NOAC. This study is aimed at determining whether or not NOAC were prescribed for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in guideline-recommended doses in community-dwelling older adults. Older adults taking NOAC for non-valvular AF presenting to a cardiology outpatient clinic for the first time were included in the study. The NOAC dose for each patient was assessed based on the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology and were categorized as appropriate or inappropriate (low or high dose). The patients were also evaluated for demographic data, diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HASBLED score, frailty and falls in the previous year. A total of 302 older adults were included in the study, with a mean age of 75.5 ± 7.5 years. One hundred eighty-four patients (60.9%) were found to be on appropriate doses of NOAC, while 109 (36.1%) were on inappropriately low doses and nine (2.98%) were on inappropriately high doses. Accordingly, 39.1% of the AF patients were found to be on inappropriate doses of NOAC, 92.4% of which were inappropriately low. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the only factor associated with inappropriate low-dose NOAC use was patient age (OR = 1.061, 95% CI = 1.009–1.116, p = 0.022). Our study suggests that the inappropriate use of lower dose NOAC may emerge as a significant problem in outpatient older adults. This inappropriate practice seems to be associated with older age rather than the diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc/HASBLED scores, frailty and presence of falls.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.